O
Humboldt County
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Coastal lighting

Humboldt County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 28, 2026.

Public comments (5)

MixedDiana PrestonJul 28, 2026

Eureka resident who urged the board to protect what hasn't been ruined yet; returned during the lighting hearing to praise shielding but voice concern about overregulation and support for tourism and wildlife.

Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 20:14 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentJul 28, 2026

Zoom caller who questioned the cost of dual coastal/inland regulations, doubted the science, and suggested the Coastal Commission should be disbanded.

Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 37:28 →
SupportiveSylvia Van RyanJul 28, 2026

Spoke for Humboldt Waterkeeper, thanking planners and urging the board to add the blanket color-temperature limit to the inland ordinance too, since blue light disrupts wildlife and causes sky glow.

Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 41:08 →
SupportiveEileen MandelbaumJul 28, 2026

Described her years at Mono Lake, where disoriented migratory birds were found in illuminated lots; said shielding actually improved security sightlines and urged adoption.

Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 43:21 →
SupportiveMark WilsonJul 28, 2026

McKinleyville astronomer representing the astronomers of Humboldt, supporting the 2700K standard, noting eyes adjust to darkness and raising the flag-lighting exemption.

Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 46:31 →