Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Outdoor Lighting Standards in Coastal Areas→At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 28, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Eureka resident who urged the board to protect what hasn't been ruined yet; returned during the lighting hearing to praise shielding but voice concern about overregulation and support for tourism and wildlife.
Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 20:14 →Zoom caller who questioned the cost of dual coastal/inland regulations, doubted the science, and suggested the Coastal Commission should be disbanded.
Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 37:28 →Spoke for Humboldt Waterkeeper, thanking planners and urging the board to add the blanket color-temperature limit to the inland ordinance too, since blue light disrupts wildlife and causes sky glow.
Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 41:08 →Described her years at Mono Lake, where disoriented migratory birds were found in illuminated lots; said shielding actually improved security sightlines and urged adoption.
Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 43:21 →McKinleyville astronomer representing the astronomers of Humboldt, supporting the 2700K standard, noting eyes adjust to darkness and raising the flag-lighting exemption.
Board of Supervisors — July 28, 2026 · 46:31 →