Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 2, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Scoffed at claims cameras record only plates, saying the infrastructure will outlast any privacy protections.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:58:10 →Supported a formal review, defunding the program, and a county ordinance banning ALPRs in unincorporated Humboldt.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 2:11:14 →Cited the transparency portal showing about 30% of 147 recent searches had no reason stated, calling it a violation of Policy 437.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 2:09:55 →Lives near a Flock camera and asked the board to defund all Flock cameras, citing data ownership and privacy risks.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 2:19:54 →A high school senior said the younger generation opposes constant tracking and AI-generated suspicion.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 2:28:12 →Read recent search reasons from the portal — mostly 'investigation' and blanks — and questioned Flock's Amazon cloud storage.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 2:30:56 →Defended Flock as a crucial tool he uses professionally, saying cell phones reveal more about people than the cameras.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 2:51:53 →Urged a no vote on Flock, citing unproven crime claims, rising subscription costs, and zero oversight.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 3:00:41 →An anonymous resident read the Flock service agreement and said 'video images' — not all data — are deleted after 30 days, recommending the county cancel the contract.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 2:17:25 →