O
Humboldt County
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Maples Tree Removal CDP

Humboldt County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 17, 2026.

Public comments (4)

SupportiveDale MaplesSep 17, 2026

The applicant described buying the burned home next to his daughter, rebuilding it all-electric with solar, and said the trees threaten the house and shade his panels — of 54 redwoods on the parcel, he only wants eight gone.

Planning Commission — September 17, 2026 · 1:44:11 →
SupportiveMark FerraSep 17, 2026

A forester with Homer & Associates who argued tree five doesn't meet the 60-inch/pre-1800 test, isn't ESHA, isn't a mapped scenic resource, and asked the commission to drop the retention condition.

Planning Commission — September 17, 2026 · 1:49:33 →
SupportiveSteven HolmanSep 17, 2026

Holman said the landowners were blindsided by the new conditions and are spending money without profit — just making their property fire-safe.

Planning Commission — September 17, 2026 · 1:52:50 →
OpposedThomas MulderSep 17, 2026

Called in again to caution that the moratorium isn't approved yet, noting the fifth-district supervisor seat changing hands could be the swing vote, and argued landowners can use their own trees without barter or trade.

Planning Commission — September 17, 2026 · 1:54:11 →